ridm@nrct.go.th   ระบบคลังข้อมูลงานวิจัยไทย   รายการโปรดที่คุณเลือกไว้

COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS

หน่วยงาน จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

รายละเอียด

ชื่อเรื่อง : COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS
นักวิจัย : Porak Sethakamnerd
คำค้น : -
หน่วยงาน : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
ผู้ร่วมงาน : Chulalongkorn University. Faculty of Dentistry , Chalermpol Leevailoj
ปีพิมพ์ : 2558
อ้างอิง : http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/49868
ที่มา : -
ความเชี่ยวชาญ : -
ความสัมพันธ์ : -
ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา : -
บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย :

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Chulalongkorn University, 2015

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the influence of material type and thickness on masking ability under various backgrounds. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 disc-shaped specimens (15 mm diameter × 0.5 and 1.0 mm thicknesses) were fabricated from lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max Press, n=6), high-translucency zirconia (Lava Plus, n=6), and high-translucency zirconia with framework modifier material (Lava Plus + Lava Ceram, n=6). Contrast ratio was measured over white and black background. Color difference was measured over various backgrounds: white, black, metal, resin composite shade A2, A3, and C4. White background was used as a control group. Contrast ratio and color difference values were analyzed with two and three-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (P<.05). Results: Contrast ratio of IPS e.max Press at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm showed highest value (0.73 ± 4.37 and 0.87 ± 0.58) when compared to Lava Plus + Lava Ceram and Lava Plus groups. IPS e.max Press at both thickness showed highest masking ability over various backgrounds were as follows: Black (ΔE = 11.64 ± 0.84, 5.61 ± 0.29), Metal (ΔE = 10.31 ± 0.60, 5.08 ± 0.27), A2 (ΔE = 8.54 ± 0.46, 4.23 ± 0.28), A3 (ΔE = 8.26 ± 0.40, 4.22 ± 0.29), and C4 (ΔE = 9.12 ± 0.46, 4.64 ± 0.29). Higher contrast ratio and masking ability significantly related to thicker material. Material type significantly related to masking ability. Conclusion: Ceramic type and thickness had significant effect on contrast ratio and masking ability. Contrast ratio and masking ability increase as thickness increase. Masking ability was highest with IPS e.max Press, intermediate with Lava Plus + Lava Ceram, and lowest with Lava Plus group.

บรรณานุกรม :
Porak Sethakamnerd . (2558). COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS.
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Porak Sethakamnerd . 2558. "COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS".
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
Porak Sethakamnerd . "COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS."
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 2558. Print.
Porak Sethakamnerd . COMPARISON OF MASKING ABILITY OF TWO CERAMICS IN TWO DIFFERENT THICKNESSES UNDER VARIOUS BACKGROUNDS. กรุงเทพมหานคร : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย; 2558.